Over the years, Mr. Blaine has represented clients through tax litigation at the state and federal level. He has helped clients recover from IRS disputes, and has taken part in cases regarding refunds that total up to a $100 million.
COMPLEX LITIGATION AND MEDIATION
The case history of Mr. Blaine consists of a wide range of complex proceedings across the country. He has represented local farmers against out-of-state conglomerates, individuals against businesses, and industrial manufacturers against multi-state class action lawsuits. Additionally, Mr. Blaine is a skilled arbitrator and mediator, schooled at the Harvard Law School Negotiation Institute on Mediating Disputes.
Carl Blaine is a partner in the law firm of Wagner Kirkman Blaine Klomparens & Youmans LLP with 35 years of federal and state litigation experience in the areas of business, partnership, corporate, real estate, fiduciary, probate and trust, elder and dependent adult abuse, employment, and tax. He is also experienced in complex litigation including prosecution and defense of class actions including products, commercial and consumer actions. Mr. Blaine has successfully brought numerous jury and court trials to verdict.
Prior to entering private practice, Mr. Blaine served as the law clerk to Presiding Justice George A. Brown of the California Court of Appeal, 1975 – 1976. He subsequently served as Deputy District Attorney for the County of San Luis Obispo, 1976 – 1980.
University of California at Santa Barbara (B.A., with High Honors, 1971)
McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific (J.D., 1975)
Law Review: Articles Editor, Pacific Law Journal, 1974-1975
Harvard Law School Negotiation Institute (Certificate of Completion, Mediating Disputes, 2014)
California State Bar, 1975
U.S. District Court, Eastern, Northern and Central Districts of California
U.S. Tax Court, 1981
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 1988
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern and Central Districts of California
HONORS AND AFFILIATIONS
Traynor Honor Society
McGeorge School of Law Alumni Association, President, 1990-1991
Sacramento County Bar Association
State Bar of California
AV® Preeminent™ 5.0 Peer Review Rated™ by Martindale-Hubbell®
Trust and Probate Litigation
Most recently, Mr. Blaine, on behalf of the siblings of a dependent adult victim, prevailed in obtaining a multimillion-dollar recovery for his clients based upon the theory that the victim’s physical and mental condition (long-term AIDS patient with prolonged use of AIDS medication) rendered him a dependent adult with limited capacity, who was seduced by his young lover into changing his trust and leaving his entire multimillion dollar estate to the victimizer after a three-month seduction. This argument prevailed even though there was technically a valid trust amendment prepared by counsel who testified that his client had capacity.
Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse (Physical and Financial)
- Mr. Blaine represented a client who owned many nursing home facilities in California and adjoining states that had been targeted for millions of dollars by the Plaintiffs Bar based upon elder abuse actions. Mr. Blaine assumed the role of general counsel in connection with defending and ultimately negotiating favorable resolutions for the client, thereby ending what was a continuing financial nightmare for the client.
- Recently Mr. Blaine successfully negotiated a settlement with a national hospice provider, without the need to file an action, based upon intentional/negligent infliction of emotional distress to the parents of the hospice patient who was living his last days with his parents in their home and who witnessed their son suffer horrific pain and suffering which could have been avoided had the care provider performed their duties.
- Mr. Blaine has prosecuted actions for financial elder abuse and is presently pursuing a case against financial advisors who improperly sold over $1,000,000 worth of annuities to his client’s parents when they were 90 years of age and of questionable capacity and susceptible to undue influence by a fiduciary.
Real Estate Litigation
Representing companies and individuals in fraud, negligence, contract transactions, broker-agent relationships, bond issues, options, easements, landlord-tenant disputes, foreclosures, HOA, condemnation, CERCLA actions, and construction defects.
Mr. Blaine recently represented a client in a complex and protracted business dissolution with tens of millions of dollars at issue and which called into play foreclosures, judgment enforcement, contempt of court proceedings, state regulatory agencies, arbitration, and state court actions. At the conclusion of this representation, the client recovered, in full, on its damage claims and all of its attorney fees and costs.
Mr. Blaine represents defrauded investors in matters subject to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and has obtained recovery for their lost investments.
Successfully representing clients in tax, district, and bankruptcy courts with IRS disputes including refund cases as high as $100,000,000.
- Mr. Blaine represented almond growers from Bakersfield to Chico in a plaintiffs’ class action against Tenneco-West, a Texas-based conglomerate, which had contracted with the farmers to process and purchase their crops. Mr. Blaine relied upon a very old agricultural law that required such contracts to be in writing and provide the amount to be paid per pound for the crop. Violations of this statute resulted in damages equal to two times the fair market value of the crop. Mr. Blaine’s farmer clients recovered millions of dollars as a result of this action.
- Mr. Blaine, on behalf of a California-based roofing shingle manufacturer, orchestrated a defense team to defend a multi-state class action which was venued in Washington state and negotiated a favorable settlement before the action was certified.
- Mr. Blaine has been schooled by Harvard Law School Negotiation Institute on Mediating Disputes. As a result, Mr. Blaine’s approach to dispute resolution is unique among the traditional community of mediators as it is primarily based upon “understanding” rather than the power of “coercion.” Under this approach, the parties themselves take primary responsibility for whether and how the dispute will be resolved. Further, under this approach, conflicts can best be resolved by uncovering what lies under the level at which the parties experience the problem.
- Mr. Blaine has been successful in getting conflicting parties to consider and engage in mediation prior to filing of formal lawsuits at which point extraordinary attorney fees have not yet been incurred and thus do not present an obstacle to early resolution.